Samsung HPT5054 50-Inch Plasma HDTV

Electronics : Samsung HPT5054 50-Inch Plasma HDTV

Samsung HPT5054 50-Inch Plasma HDTV

from: Samsung



 : Samsung HPT5054 50-Inch Plasma HDTV
See Larger Image

List Price: $1,299.99
Our Price: $1,169.86
You Save: -$130.13 (10%)
Prices subject to change.


Availability: Usually ships in 24 hours




Batteries Included: 1
Binding: Electronics
Brand: Samsung
Color: Black
EAN: 0036725250543
Label: Samsung
Legal Disclaimer: Warranty does not cover misuse of product.
Manufacturer: Samsung
Model: HPT5054
Publisher: Samsung
Studio: Samsung
Variation Description: Black



Editorial Review:






Features:
  • 1365 x 768 resolution
  • 15,000:1 Contrast Ratio
  • 18 bit color
  • Filter Bright 2 Anti Glare Technology
  • 3 HDMI, 2 component, 1 PC input





Accessories:
     see more

Accessories:




Availability: Usually ships in 24 hours


Related Items:
     see more

Related Items:



banned interdit verboden prohibido vietato proibido
  banned    interdit    verboden   vietato     prohibido    verboden  banned      vietato      interdit proibido   vietato       interdit      verboden      banned  prohibido   

Your IP has been blocked. Please perform the action below to regain access.

Code:  security image
Please enter the Code: 



Customer Reviews
Average Rating:  out of 5 stars

Rating: 4 out of 5 stars - Great TV with a few caveats
This was my first HDTV purchase. As such I did weeks of research reading every review I could find and poring over forums. In the end I found that this was one of the best picture quality/price combos you can find.

I used a DVE DVD to calibrate the picture (just the basic brightness and contrast, no color calibration yet). Overall I found most of the opinions I read to be right on. Always use the Movie mode with "Warm2". I could see possibly moving up to Warm1 or normal but I trusted the experts out there who say that warm2 has the best color fidelity.

Aside from that I kept all the extras off (Noise reduction, DNIe, auto-contrast, etc). I had an HD cable box, Xbox 360, PC and HD-DVD player hooked up (all HDMI except the PC which was through the VGA monitor hookup). All looked great. On the Xbox though I found I did actually like "Game Mode" better with some other adjustments quite different from my movie watching settings.

The picture quality on this TV seemed awesome to me. Even with the "energy saving" mode on High, contrast at 90, and Brightness at 45 it seemed plenty bright, although our living room doesn't have a lot of ambient light either.

My 2 big gripes with this TV were:
1. Image Retention. This thing has BAD IR. Sometimes I would turn the tv on and just the text that flashes up telling you what input your on would leave some IR. Now to be fair the IR has always gone away after some watching or running the built in "scrolling" screen. I'd play Rock Band for 30 minutes or so and would definitely see IR from elements of the interface. I would run the scrolling screen or watch TV for a while and all would be fine. Nevertheless, very annoying to me. I love the History Channel but would refrain from watching it because they use such a vivid, bright annoying logo on screen at all times that it would very quickly cause IR.

2. Possible noise appearing as green dots in the blacks. Now I managed to get rid of this by turning my brightness down (the level at which I ended up setting the brightness was still within the calibration range and still made for a great picture so I didn't need or want to turn it up any more) but there was definitely a threshold where if I turned up the brightness past a certain mark, dancing green dots appeared in the blacks. From everything I've read this may be perfectly normal and only really noticeable if you're too close to the TV. The fact that I could achieve a perfectly good picture while dialing out these dots made it pretty much a non-issue for me, but it still kinda bugged me and made me wonder if that was indeed normal. The more you turn the brightness up the more green dot noise would appear, but again it still wasn't too terrible from a decent viewing distance.

If I had it to do again, I would not get this TV. While it has some great features and a great picture quality, the quirks just get to me a little too much. Maybe it's just because I'm new to the whole world of HD, but I find myself wishing I'd gone with the Samsung LN46A530 LCD instead.

Great bang for the buck, especially if you're primarily a movie watcher, but I'd be wary if you're a gamer or want to watch anything with a vivid logo, scrolling ticker at the bottom, or black bars (like non-stretched 4:3 TV).



Rating: 4 out of 5 stars - Great TV! Awesome Picture! Occasional HDMI audio drop
I've had this TV for a while now and have been very happy. It's great having all of the input options. I have experienced the occasional audio dropout when using HDMI as others have referenced, but I know only use the HDMI for video processing and route the audio through a receiver so problem solved for me!



Rating: 4 out of 5 stars - GREAT TV FOR THE MONEY
THIS TV IS ABSOLUTELY FABULOUS IN HD. I CAN'T SAY MUCH ABOUT REGULAR DIGITAL TV STATIONS, I DON'T THINK THEY LOOK TOO GREAT. BUT, THAT'S WHAT MAKES THE HD LOOK ALL THE BETTER ON THIS TV. THE MENUS ARE A CINCH TO NAVIGATE AND I LOVE THE SLEEK BLACK CASING THE TV IS IN. THE SOUND ON THE OTHER HAND IS NOTHING TO BRAG ABOUT ALTHOUGH I HAVE MINE HOOKED UP TO SORROUND SOUND, SO NO PROBLEM THERE. GOOD VALUE FOR THE MONEY



Rating: 3 out of 5 stars - Big and cheap but has image retention
I had a Hitachi plasma prior to this that never had burn-in or image retention problems, ever. So needless to say I was not worried about this when buying a plasma. I figured the technolgy would be the same because I bought the Hitachi almost 2 years ago. Know I understand what image retention really is. It retains images pretty quickly, I thought this would go away after the "break-in", but it still does it. If you do the scrolling screen burn in feature it goes away. It is a big TV and has a great picture for the price, but if you are going to not like the fact that it does have image retention that goes away I would not buy it. However the better plasmas are probably going to run over a grand more. Overall I would say I would definitely buy it again, but the image retention is a pain in the butt.



Rating: 5 out of 5 stars - Great tv, great price, great value!
Great tv, great price, great value!

Beautiful color on both the screen and the frame of the tv.

Overall good buy.



read more customer reviews on Samsung HPT5054 50-Inch Plasma HDTV


 





Personal Chef Training - Cooking Contests |
  widesxreen tv
Pop Music   Shopper





The Web Services Policy Working Group has published two Web Services Policy 1.5 - Working Drafts: an update to the Primer and a First Public Working Draft of Guidelines for Policy Assertion Authors. The new Guidelines document provides ...

(Source: Sunbelt Software) Messaging, internal and Web-based threats are increasing in number and severity. The risks to organizations large and small are real problems that users and their employers face if they do not establish adequate defenses against this growing variety of threats.

Read this Osterman Research paper to learn how organizations must implement a layered defensive strategy to protect against all types of threats and how Sunbelt Software can help.


Mark Matthews' Weblog

During the process of building the new query analysis feature for MySQL Enterprise Monitor 2.0, we thought the best way to test it at a nascent stage was to use it to tune our own application (since we use MySQL as the backend repository). What we found was actually quite interesting. It also showed that even to seasoned developers, who know that frameworks while helpful, often aren‘t the most direct, concise way to get things done, can often do very strange things that you don‘t quite expect.

For those of you that haven‘t heard about the feature itself, “query analysis“ takes all queries that are being processed by a MySQL server, normalizes them into something similar to a prepared statement form by removing literals, and then keeps track of total, min/max, average execution times, result set sizes, etc. at an aggregate level. It also takes snapshots of the “worst” examples of these queries, the ones with the highest execution time.

When we started using the first implementations of the feature on our own code, we found the following, interesting output:

What stuck out (at least to us), is that there is a lot of time spent toggling auto-commit state. In fact, if you add the "on" and "off" together, it's the second-most time consuming statement in our entire application! We thought we had this licked before we even looked at this query analysis data, because our application uses transactions all of the time, so we told DBCP to always return connections in auto-commit "false" mode. We even looked through what we thought was enough of the DBCP code to make sure this would actually work. So, what was causing these statements to run anyway? Well, the trick was, at this point during implementation, the server-side agent wasn't ready, so we were injecting this query analysis data via statement interceptors in the MySQL JDBC driver. So, we also setup the “worst” query to put in a stack trace in the comment field:

So, it was indeed coming out of some glue code we‘d written to wire DBCP into hibernate for our application (and still use our existing configuration mechanisms). Once the way was pointed, we set some appropriate breakpoints, and low-and-behold, we find this gem:

public void passivateObject(Object obj) throws Exception {
if(obj instanceof Connection) {
Connection conn = (Connection)obj;
if(!conn.getAutoCommit() && !conn.isReadOnly()) {
conn.rollback();
}
conn.clearWarnings();
conn.setAutoCommit(true);
}
if(obj instanceof DelegatingConnection) {
((DelegatingConnection)obj).passivate();
}
}

It makes sense to rollback when a connection is put back in the pool, as the application could‘ve misbehaved and started a transaction but didn‘t call commit() or rollback(). But, then, DBCP, without looking at how we‘ve configured this data source (to always be in auto-commit “false“), goes ahead and sets it to “true”.

So, what to do now? Should we internally fork DBCP, and keep merging this one-liner change every time we update DBCP? Do we file a bug, and wait for a new release of DBCP (we will, eventually). How do we fix it now? Well, once again, MySQL‘s JDBC interception facilities to the rescue. We just implement a very simple ConnectionLifecycleInterceptor that has the following implementation of setAutocommit(), which lets the caller setAutoCommit(false) and have it sent to the server, yet setAutoCommit(true) will never be sent to the server, and the JDBC driver will adjust its idea of autocommit state accordingly.

public boolean setAutoCommit(boolean flag) throws SQLException {
if (!flag) {
return true;
}

return false;
}

Of course, we had to test that nothing bad happened with our application using this trick, and when we determined that it was safe to operate in this manner, we ran query analysis again, and lo-and-behold, one issue solved, other statements to fix:

In my mind, the power of this feature is looking at query performance in aggregation. Seeing the SET … statements popping up in “SHOW PROCESSLIST” (which you‘d be lucky to catch, they‘re very short), or even in the general query log, wouldn‘t have demonstrated the amount of time wasted that we see here in our UI. Using this feature we have iteratively improved performance, watching with each release which queries bubble to the top, and tackling them.

For those of you that would like to see this feature in action on your own systems, if you‘re an existing MySQL Enterprise customer, you can get access to the beta release of MySQL Enterprise Monitor 2.0 at the MySQL Enterprise website.

For those of you that aren‘t yet existing customers, hold tight, soon we‘ll refresh the enterprise trial with this codebase.

In either case, feel free to ask us questions about the new features in our forums at http://forums.mysql.com/list.php?166

For those of you wanting to integrate query analysis with your application at a source-code level like we did with this example, hold tight as well and watch this space. MySQL Enterprise Monitor 2.0 supports REST as a way to populate the repository, and I‘ll be posting an example of how to do this with Connector/J and statement interceptors soon!


DAYTON, Ohio (Reuters) - Republican John McCain made a surprise choice of Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin as his running mate on Friday, adding a political unknown to the presidential ticket who could help him appeal to women voters.






Samsung HPT5054 50-Inch Plasma HDTV

Shopping